High CourtsSingle Bench(1929) 12 MAD CK 0029

In Re: Sadayan Chetty and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 December 1929 · Citation: 124 Ind. Cas. 606(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 117 words

Jackson, J.—A Magistrate has a large discretion u/s 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code and if Kaile Lakshmayya and Others Vs. King-Emperor, goes so far as to hold that once a Magistrate has subpoened witnesses u/s 257, he is bound to compel their attendance although he is satisfied that it is unnecessary for the purposes of justice, I respectfully disagree.

2.

However, in the present case the accused clearly explained that they wanted an adjournment because their Vakil was ill, and as the witnesses were subsequently present there is no apparent reason for not letting them be cross-examined. The sentence is cancelled and the case ordered to be taken up as from when the cross-examination was refused.