High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0075

In Re: Ramakristnamma

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 March 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 398

HON’BLE JUDGES
Munro, J · Miller, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 67 words
1.

We must set aside the order on the ground that there is nothing to show that it was made in such circumstances that it can be said to have been a continuation of the proceedings in which the evidence was given [vide Aiyakannu Pillai v. Emperor 32 M. 49 : 4 M.L.T. 404 : 19 M.L.J. 42 : 9 Cri.L.J. 41 : 1 Ind. Cas. 597].