High CourtsFull Bench(1906) 02 BOM CK 0014

In Re: Ralli Bros.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 13 February 1906 · Citation: (1906) 8 BOMLR 234

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.C.I.E., C.J · Russell, J · Lawrence Jenkins, J · Aston, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil References No''s. 10-13

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 80 words

Lawrence Jenkins, K.C.I.E., C.J.—The point submitted for our decision is covered by authority binding on us, (see Rupchand Chittarshet v. Barhuvalad Sukaa (1884) P.J. 257 and in conformity with the determination in that case we must hold that the document should be stamped as a bond. It may perhaps be doubted whether this consequence was contemplated when the Act was passed; but we must construe the Act as it stands; if amendment be needed, it must be by the Legislature.