High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 02 MAD CK 0015

In Re: Ponnusawmy Pillay

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 February 1909 · Citation: 1 Ind. Cas. 79

HON’BLE JUDGES
Charles Arnold White, C.J · Miller, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

The rule referred to in the letter of the District Magistrate is made under the power conferred by Section 29(n) of the Abkari Act of 1886 and is

within the powers conferred by that section.

2.

Under this rule the Magistrate who adjudged the confiscation has power to direct that the confiscated article may be sold or destroyed.

3.

We are of opinion that the sale may reasonably be construed as not only authorising the Magistrate to direct the sale of the article, but as also

authorising him to give directions as to the mode of sale.

4.

The order of the Magistrate in the case referred to us purports to have been made u/s 517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We do not think

the order can be supported as an order under the powers conferred by that section.