High Courts(1932) 01 MAD CK 0007

In Re: Pachaimuthu alias Chinnapayyan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 January 1932 · Citation: (1932) ILR (Mad) 715 : 137 Ind. Cas. 810 : (1932) 35 LW 671 : (1932) 62 MLJ 571

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 113 words
1.

We must decline to accept the reference, which seems to be premature. The Assistant Sessions Judge should have disposed of the charges

which were triable with the aid of assessors. When he has done so, it will be open to him to consider whether the interests of justice require that he

should make a reference u/s 307, Criminal Procedure Code, on the other charge. He had no jurisdiction to refer the whole case. See Emperor Vs.

Vyankatsing Sambhusing, . The case reported in In re Mutyalu (1912) ILR 37 M. 236 raises a different question.

2.

The record will be returned to the Assistant Sessions Judge for disposal in accordance with law.