High CourtsDivision Bench(1911) 12 MAD CK 0022

In Re: P. Muneyya

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 December 1911 · Citation: (1913) ILR (Mad) 471

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sundara Ayyar, J · Spencer, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 111 words
1.

The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is absolutely illegal. He says "provided that Silam Ramudu''s alibi which is supported by the Second Court witness Papanna Narasimham is found on investigation to be true, I sanction the prosecution of Parala Muneyya and Lingam Appayya for the offence of perjury and of Sikkala Papayya for presumably abetting them," No sanction can be granted of a provisional character in case certain conditions are satisfied in the future. It was the duty of the Magistrate before granting sanction to satisfy himself that there was, at the time of the order, a permit facie case against the petitioners here.

2.

We set aside the order.