High CourtsDivision Bench(1946) 07 MAD CK 0024

In Re: Narra Padmavathamma

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 July 1946 · Citation: (1946) 59 LW 554 : (1946) 2 MLJ 271

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yahya Ali, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 180 words

Yahya Ali, J.—This application is to revise an order made by the Joint Magistrate of Chendragiri making absolute a preliminary order u/s

133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

I am satisfied that sufficient opportunity was not given to the petitioner to show cause against the confirmation of the preliminary order. She is a

lady who observes purdha and the notice itself had been served on her agent who promptly applied for time on the ground that notice was too

short. Inspite of it the application for time was refused and the preliminary order was made absolute. In a matter like this it is essential that the party

aggrieved should have sufficient opportunity to meet the charge.

3.

The order in M. C. No. 50 of 1945, dated 27th September, 1945, is set aside and the joint Magistrate is directed to issue a fresh notice to the

petitioner giving her sufficient time and opportunity to meet the case. All proceedings which have been issued on the footing of the order which has

been now set aside will stand vacated.