High CourtsSingle Bench(1878) 02 AHC CK 0013

In Re: Narain Das

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 27 February 1878 · Citation: (1875) ILR (All) 610

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pearson, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 97 words

Pearson, J.—The opinion of the Assessors does not appear to have been taken as it is not found on the record. The omission to take it was a serious irregularity and must be pointed out to the Judge, and lie must be cautioned to avoid a similar irregularity in future. At the same time I cannot hold that it affected the conduct of the prosecution or prejudiced the prisoner in his defence, and it is not therefore, with reference to the provisions of Sections 283 and 300 of Act X of 1872, a ground for revisional interference.