High CourtsDivision Bench(1930) 12 MAD CK 0010

In Re: Nandipati Ramireddi and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 December 1930 · Citation: (1931) ILR (Mad) 251 : (1931) 33 LW 542 : (1931) 60 MLJ 694

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 98 words

Jackson, J.—It seems that an entirely wrong system of procedure is developing in the Lower Courts. Accused persons before they are

charged and put upon their defence anticipate their defence by petitions on which the trial Court writes written orders, and these are then brought

up on revision. The procedure is quite misconceived. An accused person must wait till he is charged before he defends himself, and if he is

convicted his first remedy is in most cases by way of appeal. At this stage there is no room for revision.

2.

The Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed.