High CourtsDivision Bench(1939) 02 MAD CK 0040

In Re: Muthuswami Pillai

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 February 1939 · Citation: AIR 1939 Mad 839 : (1939) 50 LW 919 : (1939) 2 MLJ 39

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 107 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—The charge-sheet filed by the Police u/s 379, Indian Penal Code, sets out the facts which constitute the offence u/s

163, Clause (a)(2) of the Madras Local Boards Act and as pointed out in the Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty (1926) 52 M.L.J. 210 : ILR

49 Mad. 525 , this would amount to a complaint as defined in Section 4, Clause (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 223 of the Madras

Local Boards Act empowers the police to make the complaint and the charge-sheet was filed within three months of the commission of the

offence. The revision petition therefore fails and is dismissed.