High CourtsSingle Bench(1909) 04 MAD CK 0017

In Re: Mantri Kamaraju

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 April 1909 · Citation: 2 Ind. Cas. 128

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 175 words

Ralph Benson, J.—The order of the Sessions Judge staying the trial of Sessions Cases Nos. 47 to 49 of 1908, pending appeal, if any, by

the accused against the conviction in Sessions Cases Nos. 44 to 46 of 1908 is not warranted by Section 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code,

under which it purports to have been made.

2.

The opening words of that section make it clear that it is only applicable to joinder of charges in the same case, not to separate charges of

distinct offences tried separately as in the present case. This was ruled in the unreported case Queen v. Sadia Unrep. Cr. Cas. Bom. p. 362

3.

It may be observed that the Sessions Judge might have attained the desired object by adjourning the trial u/s 344, Criminal Procedure Code,

pending appeal, if any, in the other cases and the result thereof. u/s 494, Criminal Procedure Code, the Public Prosecutor, might, with the consent

of the Court, have withdrawn from the prosecution and may still do so, if so advised.