High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 10 MAD CK 0016

In Re: M. Muthaya

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 October 1915 · Citation: (1916) ILR (Mad) 895

HON’BLE JUDGES
Phillips, J · Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 97 words

Ayling, J.—It is argued that petitioner being merely the depot-writer and not the licensee, is not liable to prosecution u/s 56 of the Abkari

Act, It has been held by a bench of this Court in an unreported ease--Re Sudalaimuthu (1886) 1 Wei Cr. R. 647--that Sections 64 and 56 must

be read together, and that not only the licensee, but the actual offender (in this case the petitioner) is liable to prosecution for an offence u/s 56.

Following this, we must reject petitioner''s contention.

2.

No other ground for interference is shown. The petition is dismissed.