High CourtsDivision Bench(1937) 04 MAD CK 0041

In Re: Kumarappa Chettiar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 April 1937 · Citation: AIR 1938 Mad 213 : (1938) 47 LW 322

HON’BLE JUDGES
King, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 154 words

King, J.—This petition is not seriously opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor. All that has been proved is that the petitioners have committed certain acts of violence in the past. What must be proved in order to justify an order of this kind is that the petitioners are likely to break the peace in future. Does any occasion, does any cause of quarrel exist which is likely to cause them to break the peace? The learned Sessions Judge has not found that any exists. He disbelieves the main feature of the prosecution that the petitioners formed a compact with the object of using force in agitating against the landlords.

2.

In these circumstances, it is not enough for the learned Sessions Judge merely to say that he thinks that men who have been violent once will be violent again: see In Re: Maruthapali Goundar, and I set aside the order binding over the petitioners.