High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 06 CAL CK 0016

In Re Kanchan Dhibar And Others vs State

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 June 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J · Joymalya Bagchi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No 192 Of 2018, 3649 Of 2020,

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 216 words

Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in murdering the housewife, we are of the opinion that he does not stand on the same footing with co-accused

persons who are already on bail and as there is no significant change in the circumstances of this case since last rejection of bail by this Court, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

C.R.M. 192 of 2018

In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.