High CourtsDivision Bench(1877) 07 CAL CK 0003

In Re: Janokey Nath Roy

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 15 July 1877 · Citation: (1877) ILR (Cal) 466

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richard Garth, C.J · Markby, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 164 words

Richard Garth, C.J.—We are clearly of opinion that no appeal lies in this case, and that we ought not to grant leave to admit the appeal. Leave granted by a Judge to institute proceedings is not a "judgment" within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Charter. If authority were wanted, the case of The Justices of the Peace of Calcutta v. The Oriental Gas Co. 8 B.L.R. 433 would be ample authority for our judgment. But apart from that, this leave given by the Court is the creation of a late Statute. It is a power which did not exist when the Charter was passed. It is a power of a peculiar kind. The object is to check rash proceedings in criminal matters being taken. It gives power to take proceedings, which could not have been taken without leave. As the Legislature has not thought fit to give an appeal from such an order, we think that this appeal should not be admitted.