High Courts(1946) 02 MAD CK 0004

In Re: Govinda Rao

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 February 1946 · Citation: (1946) 2 MLJ 165

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 66 words
1.

By Clause 15 of the Letters Patent it is necessary that the Judge who has passed the judgment in a second appeal shall certify it as a fit case for

appeal in order that an appeal under that clause may lie. It is suggested that Clause 44 somehow abrogates the effect of Clause 15. We are unable

to appreciate this contention. The petition is rejected.