Supreme CourtFull Bench(1999) 09 SC CK 0131

In Re: E and I of Dowry Prohibition Act, 61

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 17 September 1999 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3638 : (1999) 9 SCC 40 : (2000) SCC(L&S) 164

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. S. Anand, C.J · M. Srinivasan, J · K. Venkataswami, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P. (Civil) No. 499/97

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

Rules have not so far been framed under Section 10 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 by the States/U.Ts. of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Manipur, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Karnataka, Nagaland, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu.

2.

Rules have been framed and are awaiting approval of the competent authority insofar as the States of Mizoram, Meghalaya and Orissa are concerned.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the States where the rules have not been framed submit that on account of elections, steps could not be taken so far. They pray for eight weeks'' time to file affidavits, indicating the status at which the exercise regarding framing of the Rules in their respective States is. We grant the time.

4.

We are informed by learned Amicus Curiae that the States of Karnataka, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi have not constituted the Advisory Boards under the Act so far. Learned counsel appearing for these States submit that within eight weeks, they will file affidavits and indicate the status of the steps being taken for constitution of the Advisory Boards in their respective States.

5.

List the matter after ten weeks.