High CourtsSingle Bench(1972) 06 MAD CK 0002

In Re: David and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 June 1972 · Citation: (1972) LW(Cri) 200

HON’BLE JUDGES
Maharajan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal R.C. No''s. 472 and 492 of 1970 and Criminal R.P. No. 471 of 1970

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 298 words

Maharajan, J.—The Petitioners in these petitions were accused 1 and 2 in C.C. No. 25228 of 1968 on the file of the Fifth Presidency

Magistrate, Egmore, and each of them has been convicted of the offence of criminal trespass u/s 447 , Indian Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default to suffer R.1. for one month.

2.

The case of the prosecution was that the Petitioners committed criminal trespass upon the tank bed in Peravallur belonging to the Government

and were found supervising the construction of houses upon the tank bed. S. 441, I. P. C. defines criminal trespass and says that whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person in possession of such property, is said to commit criminal trespass. No evidence has adduced in this case to show that the accused entered upon the tank bed with intent to commit any offence. It may be they have instigated encroachment upon Government property by assisting others to construct huts thereon.

But such an encroachment would not constitute an offence within the meaning of I. P. C. Nor is there any evidence to show that the person in possession of the tank bed was sought to be intimidated, insulted or annoyed by the Petitioners. The ingredients or the offence of criminal trespass are conspicuous by their absence in this case and the learned Magistrate was unjustified in convicting the Petitioners of the offence u/s 447, I. P. C.

The convictions are clearly illegal. So are the sentences and both are set aside. Petitioners are acquitted of the offences u/s 447 I. P. C. The fine if collected from them shall be refunded to them.