High CourtsDivision Bench(1938) 03 MAD CK 0020

In Re: Appu Goundan

Madras High Court · Decided on 31 March 1938 · Citation: AIR 1938 Mad 784 : 175 Ind. Cas. 891 : (1938) 48 LW 145 : (1938) 2 MLJ 43

HON’BLE JUDGES
Horwill, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 97 words

Horwill, J.—I find no reason to interfere. A statement by an accused person that the offence committed by him is a more serious one, not

triable by the Magistrate, does not deprive the Magistrate of jurisdiction unless the prosecution accept the truth of that statement or the Magistrate

is of opinion that it is true. As the accused was found in possession of wash, the presumption set out in Section 64 operates and the accused is

presumed to have committed an offence punishable u/s 55 of Act I of 1886.

2.

The Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed.