High CourtsDivision Bench(1901) 04 MAD CK 0017

Imbichunni Nayar vs Lalji Ram Doss Sait and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 April 1901 · Citation: (1901) ILR (Mad) 560

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J · Bhashyam Ayyangar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 135 words
1.

This is a petition which ought to have been presented under the provisions of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act and not u/s 622 of the

Code of Civil Procedure.

2.

The facts are not clearly stated, but apart from what is stated in the surety''s petition, which is not verified, it appears that the insolvency petition

was filed in due time, and that it was on a subsequent occasion that the judgment-debtor failed to appear when called upon. On these facts,

following Koylash Chandra Shaha v. Christophoridi ILR 15 Calc. 171 and Dwarkadas Parshotamdas v. Isabhai Daudkhan ILR 19 Bom. 210 we

must hold that the surety could not be held liable. We must set aside the order of the lower Court, Costs of this petition must be paid by the first

respondent.