High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 12 PAT CK 0003

ikash Kumar, Son of Late Pankaj Singh vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 3 December 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Birendra Kumar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 2839 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 336 words

Birendra Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for anticipatory bail by order dated 26.05.2018 in A.B.P. No.214 of 2018 passed by the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai P.S.Case No. 34 of 2018 and SC/ST Case No.59 of 2018 registered under Sections 147,148,149,448,353,427 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 3(2)(Va)3(R)S of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.

Under the leadership of the appellant, a mob had blocked the road traffic to make success their programme of "Bharat Band". The mob allegedly damaged the statue of Baba Sahab Bhim Rao Ambedkar.

Submission is that the case diary would reveal that there is no evidence that the appellant was involved in causing to damage the statue nor the appellant has got any criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that since the appellant was leading the mob he cannot escape his vicarious liability being a member of the unlawful assembly.

Considering the fact that appellant was not directly engaged in damage to the statue, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.