High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 10 DEL CK 0490

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shishupal & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 108 Of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 328 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) by its judgment dated 06.12.2010 on accident claim case (MACT 841/2010) instituted on

22.09.2007 by the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) awarded compensation on account of the death of Ranjeet in a motor

vehicular accident that took place on 13.09.2007 involving use of three-wheeler scooter bearing registration no.DL-1RF-5320 (TSR), fastening the

liability on the appellant / insurance company (insurer). It may be mentioned here that the claim petition was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 based on the averments that the deceased was an auto mechanic who had taken out the TSR from the workshop where it had

been brought for repairs and in the course of such driving, he lost control over the vehicle resulting in the accident, which proved fatal for him.

2.

The insurance company questions the direction by the tribunal for it to indemnify the registered owner by paying the compensation on the ground it

is not a case of third party claim.

3.

The contention of the insurance company must be accepted in view of the decisions of the Supreme Courts in New India Assurance Company Ltd.

vs. Sadanand Mukhi & Ors., (2009) 2 SCC 417 and Ningamma & Anr. vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd., (2009) 13 SCC 710 and a number

of similarly placed cases decided by this court including the judgment dated 09.05.2016 in MACA 550/2013, New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.

Neeraj and Ors. Since the deceased cannot be treated as a third party in relation to the insurance company he having stepped into the shoes of the

owner, the impugned judgment in so far as it bound the insurance company to pay compensation cannot be sustained and is set aside accordingly.

4.

The amount of compensation deposited by the insurance company in terms of interim order dated 08.02.2011, alongwith statutory deposit, shall be

refunded.

5.

The appeal is disposed of in above terms.