Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 08 NCLAT CK 6224

Idulupati Srinivasa Rao vs Kalvakolanu Murali Krishna Prasad & Ors.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 4 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
N. Seshasayee, Member (Judicial) · Jatindranath Swain, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 276/2026 (IA Nos. 781, 782 & 953/2026)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 177 words

ORDER

This appeal is preferred challenging an order of the Adjudicating Authority, rejecting a scheme framed under Section 230 of the Companies Act, as the same was beyond 90 days, as prescribed under Regulation 2B(1) of Liquidation Process, Regulations. In M/s. Prakash Oil Depot Vs. G. Madhusudhan Rao & Anr, (CA (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 304/2025), vide order dated 01.08.2025, this Tribunal held that a period of 90 days as prescribed in Regulation 2B(1) is only directory and not mandatory.

Be that as it may. The respondent no. 2, the sole financial creditor has filed a memo that, the proposal may have to be routed through the SCC.

We only now decide whether the period of 90 days as stipulated in Regulation 2B(1) is directory and not mandatory and this is answered in M/s. Prakash Oil Depot case.

So far as compliance of other statutory requirements are concerned, the same shall adopt what is prescribed.

Subject to the observation made herein, we allow the appeal, set aside the order and remand the matter back to the SCC.