High Courts(1867) 01 CAL CK 0001

Hurronath Roy and Others vs Maheroollah Mollah

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 8 January 1867

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 139 words

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Kemp, L.S. Jackson and Markby, JJ.—We are of opinion that the view taken by the Judge of the Small Cause Court is the correct one. The suit is brought upon the bond itself, and not upon any fresh agreement alleged to have been come to between the parties. Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that limitation did run from the time when default was made in the payment of the first installment, in consequence of which the whole amount became due. It is unnecessary for us to express any opinion as to the correctness of the decision to which reference has been made by the Judge of the Small Cause Court.

Norman, J.

I entirely agree. I had occasion to consider this question in the case of Breen v. Balfour Bourke''s Rep., 120.