Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1983) 01 SC CK 0004

Hukumchand Amolikchand Logde vs Madhava Balaji Potdar and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 31 January 1983 · Citation: AIR 1983 SC 540 : (1983) 1 SCALE 707 : (1984) SCC 600 Supp

HON’BLE JUDGES
D. A. Desai, J · A. N. Sen, J
RESULT
dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 788 of 1982

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 220 words
1.

Petition for special leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court was granted. Ex-parte ad interim stay of execution was granted subject to notice of motion being taken. The matter is listed to-day for confirmation of ex-parte ad-interim stay.

2.

Mr. S.B. Bhasme, learned Counsel for the respondents, fairly conceded that the High Court was in error in not examining the revision petition of the appellants on merits on the short ground that the appellants had failed to deposit the rent. This was an untenable ground and it was so conceded by Mr. Bhasme, Revision petition once admitted has to be disposed of on merits. The High Court was in error in dismissing the revision petition on account of failure of the appellants to deposit some rent which had become due. Therefore, the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition is liable to be set aside. It is no use of keeping the matter pending here. Therefore, we set aside the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition of the appellants and remit the matter to the High Court to hear the revision petition on merits as early as possible. On account of the very fair attitude adopted by Mr. Bhasme, learned Counsel for the respondents, we make no order as to costs.