Supreme CourtFull Bench(1998) 08 SC CK 0059

Hombanana Nagappa Alur vs Food Corporation of India

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 August 1998 · Citation: (1999) 2 ARBLR 118 : (1998) 9 JT 491 : (1999) 1 SCC 703

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. N. Khare, J · S. C. Agrawal, J · B. N. Kirpal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3631 of 1998 Arising out of SLP (C) No. 91 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 255 words

S.C. Agrawal, J.—Special leave granted.

2.

This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the respondent for the recovery of Rs. 6587.80 towards the value of short supply of rice. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court. An appeal filed by the respondent was dismissed by the appellate court on the ground that the matter should have been referred for arbitration. The High Court in second appeal has disagreed with the said view of the appellate court and has held that since steps had not been taken u/s 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the defendant should be deemed to have submitted jurisdiction to the civil court. But instead of remitting the matter to the appellate court for considering the appeal on merits, the High Court while allowing the second appeal has decreed the suit of the respondent. In our opinion, the said course was not permissible since the appellate court had not considered the matter on merits and had decided the appeal on a short point of matter being referred for arbitration. The only course which was open to the High Court in the circumstances was to remand the matter to the appellate court for considering the appeal on merits. In the circumstances, we are unable to uphold the judgment of the High Court. The appeal is, therefore, allowed, the impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside and the appeal filed by the respondent is remitted to the appellate court for considering on merits. No order as to costs.