Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 11 NCLT CK 0044

Hitachi Consulting India Private Limited Vs

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 18 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskara Pantula Mohan, Member (J) · Hemant Kumar Sarangi, Member (T)
CASE NUMBER
Company Application No. (CAA) 98(PB)/2021 Connected With Company Application No. CA (CAA) 43(PB)/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 860 words

Hemant Kumar Sarangi, Member (Technical)

1.

This petition has been filed by the Petitioner Company ( for  brevity Transferee company") under Sections 230 to 232 of the    Companies   Act, 2013   read   with   Rule 15(1)   of  the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations)  Rules, 2016,  for  the  Scheme  of Arrangement (for brevity Scheme), praying for fixing a date of hearing of the main Company Petition, for approving the scheme of arrangement by way of amalgamation, as well as for issuance of direction concerning publication of notices in the   press  to  be  carried  and  notices  to  be  issued  to  the authorities concerned, including regulators, if any.

2.

It is seen from the records that the First Motion application  seeking  convening/dispensation  from  convening  the meetings  of  Shareholders  and  Creditors  of the  petitioner companies   was   filed   before   this   Bench   vide   Company Application     CA(CAA)43(PB)/2021.     Based    on    such   joint application,  moved     under     Sections 230-232 of     the Companies Act, 2013, vide order dated 25.08.2021, passed by   this   Bench,   directions  were  issued  by  this  Tribunal, wherein it has been observed that the registered office of the Transferor Company falls within the jurisdiction of National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench. The approval of the  same  shall be taken by the Transferor Company form the  National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench for the Scheme to be considered sanctioned. For the Transferee the   meeting  of  equity  share  holders  has  been  dispensed with, Transferee Company has no Secured Creditor, hence the necessity of convening a meeting of the Creditors does not arise. Transferee Company has 34 Unsecured Creditors, 6 creditors out of the total have given their consent by way of consent affidavits holding 95.633% in total value, hence the    necessity    of   convening    a   meeting   of   the    secured Creditors was dispensed with. It is seen that the registered office  of the  Transferee  companies  is  situated  in  NOT  of Delhi; within the territorial jurisdiction of this Bench.

3.

Therefore, in the present second motion petition, filed under  Sections 230 to 232 of Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 16    of   the    Companies (Compromise,   Arrangements   and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016, the prayer for fixing a date of hearing,   as   well  as  for  other  consequential  directions  is allowed with the following directions: -

(i)  The next date of hearing of the Petition shall be on 23.12.2021 for the consideration of the approval of the     Scheme     of   Amalgamation     as     contemplated between the Petitioner Companies.

(ii) Notice  of the  hearing shall be  advertised  in  the newspapers  namely,   "Business  Standard" (English, Delhi edition) and "Business Standard" in Vernacular (Hindi, Delhi edition) not less than 10 days before the next date fixed for hearing.

(iii)   In   addition   to   the  public   notice,   each   of the Petitioners shall serve the notice of the Petition on the following Authorities namely,  (a) Central Government through Regional Director (Northern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs; (b) Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi 86 Haryana, Ministry of Corporate Affairs; (c) the Income Tax Department through the Income Tax Cell at at DCIT (HC Cell), Lawyer's Chamber Block No. 1, Room No. 428   & 429 Delhi High Court, New Delhi; and (d) Official Liquidator; and to such other Sectoral Regulatory Authorities who are likely to be affected by the Scheme, at least 30 days before the date fixed for hearing of the above Petition. The said authorities are directed to send their representations if any,  within  30 days from the date of receipt of such notice as per the provisions of sub-section 5 of Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.

(iv)     Further,    notices   shall   also   be   served   to   the Objector(s)    or   to    their   representative,    if  any,    as contemplated under Sub-Section (4) of Section 230 of the   Companies   Act, 2013   who   may   have   made representation and who have desired to be heard in their representation along with a copy of the Petition and the Annexures filed therewith at least  15 days before the date fixed for hearing.

(v)  All the Petitioner companies shall, at least 7 days  before   the  date  of hearing  of the  Petition,  file  an affidavit  of service  in  relation  to paper publication  effected    as     well    as     service     of   notices    on    the Authorities   specified   above   includina   the   Seetnrn1 Regulators as well as to the Objectors, if any.

(vi)     Objections,  if any,  to the Scheme contemplated by the authorities to whom notices have been given, may file their objections on or before the date fixed for hearing, failing which it will be considered that there is  no  objection on the part of the authorities to the approval of the Scheme by this Tribunal and subject to     other    conditions     being    satisfied    as    may    be applicable    under   the    Companies   Act, 2013   and relevant rules framed thereunder.

(vii)   The    Petitioner    Companies    shall    individually comply with proviso to sub section (3) of Section 232 or proviso  to sub  section (7)  of Section 230,  of the Companies Act, 2013, as may be applicable under the circumstances on or before the date fixed for hearing by filing the required certificate of Company's auditor.

(viii) The     petitioner  companies  shall     file  their respective   up   to   date  audited financial  statements before the next date of hearing.

Let a copy of the order be served to the parties.