High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 08 CAL CK 0645

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and others vs Prasanta Soren

Calcutta High Court, Appellate Side · Decided on 21 August 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J · Uday Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
M.A.T 769 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 347 words

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J

1.

The present appeal has been preferred against an ad interim order of injunction granted by the learned Single Judge.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that despite the appellants having created third party rights in respect of the subject tank trucks prior to the passing of the order, the learned Single Judge passed a restraint order in respect of seven tank trucks.

3.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent opposes such contention and argues that the said objection was not taken before the learned Single Judge.

4.

To this, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants, precisely for pointing out such fact, sought for directions of affidavit.

5.

Be that as it may, since we are apprised that the writ petition is itself fixed for hearing before the learned Single Judge on September 8, 2025 and affidavits have already been exchanged in respect of the same and the writ petition is otherwise ready for hearing, we do not intend to take up the appeal on merits, as any observation made by this Bench in appeal might prejudice the hearing of the writ petition itself.

6.

In any event, since the dispute as raised in the present appeal can only be thrashed out upon affidavits being exchanged, we relegate the matter to be heard before the learned Single Judge.

7.

Accordingly, MAT 769 of 2025, along with the connection application, bearing CAN 1 of 2025, are disposed of without interfering with the impugned order as well as without entering into the merits of the rival contentions of the parties, requesting the learned Single Judge to take up the writ petition itself for hearing on the next scheduled date, that is, on September 8, 2025.

8.

Needless to say, all points are kept open to be decided by the learned Single Judge at the final hearing of the writ petition.

9.

There will be no order as to costs.

10.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.