High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 06 SHI CK 0121

Himachal Spirit vs State Of H.P. & Ors

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 23 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J · Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1512 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 11790 Of 2020, 6553 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 393 words

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J

1.

The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:-

“(i) That the letter/order dated 05.05.2020 passed by respondents may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner may kindly be permitted

to sell the ready to move stocks and raw material.

(ii) That the respondents be restrained from interfering in running the unit till the existence of lease agreement.â€​

2.

It is not in dispute that the petitioner and private respondents have already resorted to arbitral proceedings by issuing notice to this effect. Therefore,

the instant petition has virtually been rendered infructuous, however, the question of lifting of the stock, which is lying in the premises of respondent

No. 5, is still at large.

3.

The parties are ad idem that the stock in question belongs to the petitioner and the same can be permitted to be lifted only after the dues of the

official respondents and other persons and/or Authority(ies) are cleared.

4.

As a matter of fact, the prayers in both the applications are virtually the same, namely, seeking directions to the official respondents, for permitting

the petitioner to lift the stock.

5.

Accordingly, we deem it proper to allow both these applications by directing the official respondents to permit the sale of the stock lying in the

premises of respondent No. 5, by associating both the petitioner as also the private respondents. The sale shall be conducted in such a manner, so as

to fetch the maximum amount of revenue, which is only possible after resorting to sell through public auction or by competitive bidding.

6.

Accordingly, the official respondents are permitted to sell the entire stock lying in the premises of respondent No. 5 by associating the petitioner as

also the private respondents and the same shall be carried out only after wide publicity in the newspaper/television/cable network.

7.

In addition thereto, notice shall also be placed at the conspicuous part of the factory premises as also the office of the Collectorate. The sale

proceeds shall be not distributed to any of the parties but shall be deposited in the Registry of this Court and same shall be subject to further orders of

this Court.

8.

The instant petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also pending applications, if any. Parties are left to bear their own costs.