Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 12 ITAT CK 4894

Het Ram vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "G", New Delhi · Decided on 4 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member · Madhumita Roy, Judicial Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA Nos. 4146, 4147, 4148 & 4149/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 473 words

The instant appeals, filed by the assessee, are directed against separate orders all dated 04.03.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, arising out of separate orders of RJN-W-(107)(91), under Section(s) 147 r.w.s. 144; 270A; 272A & 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), respectively, for the assessment year 2018-19. All these appeals were taken up together and are being disposed of by a common order for the sake of convenience.

2.

At the outset the Learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the assessee, submitted that the taxpayer’s jurisdiction lies with “ITO WD 1, Churu, Rajasthan”, which falls under the territorial jurisdiction of ITAT, Jodhpur. However, inadvertently, the instant appeals have been wrongly filed with ITAT, Delhi Benches. A written representation dated 04.12.2025 has also been filed to this effect, as reproduced herein below:

“To

The Hon ble Members,

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,

Bench "G", New Delhi

Subject: Request for Transfer of Appeal ITA No. 4146/DEL/2025 (Α.Υ. 2018-19)

PAN: BUYPR934211 | Appellant: Shri Het Ram

Respected Sir/Madam,

1.

CA Mohit Soni, Authorized Representative of the appellant Shri Het Ram, most respectfully submit this application requesting transfer of the above-mentioned appeal from the Hon'ble ITAT Delhi Bench to the Hon'ble ITAT Jodhpur Bench The appeal was nadvertently filed with the Delhi Bench due to an error in Form 36, wherein the jurisdictional officer was mistakenly mentioned as Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, New Delhi This incorrect mention led to the automatic filing of the appeal in Delhi

However, the appellant's jurisdictional Assessing Officer is located in Churu, Rajasthan, which falls under the territorial jurisdiction of the Hon'ble ITAT Jodhpur Bench. Accordingly, the matter is required to be adjudicated by the Hon'ble ITAT Jodhpur Bench.

A revised Form 36 correcting the jurisdictional details has already been submitted before the Registry

In view of the above facts, it is humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Bench may kindly order the transfer of Appeal No. ITA 4146/DE1/2025 to the Hon'ble ITAT Jodhpur Bench for proper adjudication as per jurisdiction

I shall remain prateful for your kind consideration

Respectfully submitted

(CA Mohit Soni)

Authorized Representative

Date: 04-12-2025

Place: New Delhi.”

3.

Having regard to the fact that the instant appeals have been wrongly filed before ITAT Delhi Benches, having no jurisdiction as contended by the assessee in his representation dated 04.12.2025, which has further been confirmed by the Learned DR that the taxpayer’s jurisdictional Assessing Officer is located at Churu, Rajasthan, falling under the territorial jurisdictional of ITAT, Jodhpur Bench, these appeals are dismissed due to lack of valid jurisdiction. However, for proper adjudication of the matter, the assessee would be at liberty to file appeals before the jurisdictional Bench of the ITAT. Ordered accordingly.

4.

In the result, assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos. 4146, 4147, 4148 & 4149/Del/2025 are dismissed.