High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 06 P&H CK 0021

Hemant and another vs State of Haryana and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahesh Grover
CASE NUMBER
M-21681 of 2017 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 374 words
1.

This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure praying for directions to respondent nos. 2 to 4 to protect their life

and liberty which is alleged to be in danger at the hands of respondent nos. 5

to 7 on account of their having got married against their parental consent.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the

petitioners are major.

3.

Even though this Court is disinclined to entertain and to go into

such allegations, but at the same time it cannot be oblivious to the fact that

because of social friction and sectarian differences such incidents are not

entirely unheard of and prima facie the case also appears to be covered by

the observations of Supreme Court in Fiaz Ahmed Ahanger & Ors. vs.

State of J&K 2009(3) RAJ 692, which are as under:-

"In such cases of intercaste or inter-religion

marriage the Court has only to be satisfied about two

things:-

(1) that the girl is above 18 years of age, in which case,

the law regards her as a major vide Section 3 of the

Indian Majority Act, 1875. A major is deemed by the law

to know what is in his or her welfare.

(2) The wish of the girl.

In the circumstances, we direct that nobody

will harass, threaten or commit any acts of violence or

other unlawful act on the petitioner, Chanchali

Devi/Mehvesh Anjum and the petitioner''s family

members and they shall not be arrested till further orders

in connection with the case in question. If they feel

insecure, they can apply to the police and, in such event,

the police shall grant protection to them."

4.

In view of this, the petition is disposed of with a direction to

respondent no.2 to look into the allegations as contained in the petition

personally and take necessary steps in accordance with law if the situation so

warrants.

5.

This order shall not be construed to be conferring the legitimacy

or authenticity to the factum of marriage having been performed as the Court

is clearly deprived of any means to determine the aforesaid facts.

6.

Copy of the petition along with a copy of this order be sent to

respondent no.2.