High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 KL CK 4898

Hemalatha vs The Superintendent & Anr.

High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam · Decided on 29 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viju Abraham, J
CASE NUMBER
WP(C) No. 33343 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 163 words

Viju Abraham, J.

The petitioner is employed as a Cleaning Staff with the 1st respondent under the Karunya Arogya Suraksha Padhathi, and contends that she has been continuing from 2016 onwards and that her period of engagement will be over by 30.09.2026. The petitioner made a request as per Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent seeking an extension of the period of her contract appointment. No action has been taken on the grievance raised by the petitioner.

2.

Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken as directed above, the service of the petitioner shall not be terminated.