High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 SHI CK 0249

Hem Raj Thakur vs Jai Prakash Thakur

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 25 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Original Petiton Contempt No. 139 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 255 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

This petition has been filed praying for initiation of action against respondent Jai Prakash Thakur, on the ground that the respondent-contemnor has

willfully disobeyed the order passed by this Court dated 25.06.2019, passed in CMP No. 1963 of 2019, filed in RSA No. 105 of 2019.

2.

Record demonstrates that vide order dated 25.06.2019, in a miscellaneous application filed alongwith the regular second appeal by the contemnor-

applicant, an order was passed by the Court directing the parties to maintain status quo qua the nature and possession of the suit land. The allegation

of the petitioner herein is that this order of status quo passed by the Court stands violated by the contemnor who carried out construction upon the

disputed property after the passing of the status quo order by the Court.

3.

Learned Counsel for the contemnor submits that status quo ante stands restored by the contemnor who tenders unconditional and unqualified

apology for said act of his.

4.

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that status quo ante stands restored by the contemnor, this Court

is refraining from taking any strict action against the contemnor by accepting the unconditional and unqualified apology tendered by him, but the

contemnor is warned that, in case, in future, during the pendency of the appeal, he again indulges in such like acts, then the Court shall not show any

leniency to him.

With these observations, the contempt proceedings are ordered to be closed. Notice discharged.