High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 01 RAJ CK 0046

Heena D/o Abdul Hameed vs Dastgir Ahamad S/o Mustafa Hussain Musalman

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 January 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
78 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

36 paragraphs · 358 words
1.

The present application has been moved for seeking transfer

of case filed by the husband under Guardianship and Wards Act,

which is pending before the Learned Family Court-I, Jodhpur to

the Court of District Judge, Tonk.

2.

The applicant out of the wedlock with the non-applicant has

a daughter Naimat, who was born on 15.12.2006 and she is 10

years old. It is applicant''s case that she had been subjected to

cruelty and has filed case under Section 12 of Protection of

Women from Domestic Violence Act, which is pending at Devli,

District Tonk. She submits that it would be very difficult for her to

come alone with minor daughter all the way to Jodhpur for the

purpose of the case which has been filed by the husband, more so

as her child is in a delicate age of only 10 years.

3.

The respondent husband has opposed the application and

states that applicant is well educated and she can travel. Counsel

for the non-applicant has cited one judgment reported in (2003)

11 SCC 731 Gayatri Mohapatra versus Ashit Kumar Panda wherein

the Apex Court rejected the application of transfer on the ground

of difficulty to travel.

4.

Counsel for the applicant has also cited judgment reported in

2013DNJ (SC) 758 Smt. T.Gayatri Devi versus Dr. Tallepaneni

Sreekanth, wherein refusal to transfer the suit was held to be not

justified although the wife was in service.

5.

This Court in case of Ritu Ojha versus Shiv Raj Ojha decided

on 13.12.2016 has held that comparative hardship of the lady

shall have to be looked into for the purpose of deciding the

transfer application relating to matrimonial case.

6.

In view of the facts stated in the application this Court is

satisfied that the applicant has just cause to move the transfer

application.

7.

The application is, accordingly allowed, the suit No.24/14

(Dastgir Ahamad verus Heena) pending before the Court of Family

Court-I is directed to be transferred to the Court of District Judge,

Tonk who may further assign it to the Court at Devli. Both the

parties may appear before the Learned District Judge, Tonk on

13.02.2017.