Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 12 AFT CK 0009

Hav/Clk (SD) Raj Kumar vs Union of India & Ors

Armed Forces Tribunal · Decided on 8 December 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Menon, Chairperson, (J) · P.M. Hariz, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
O.A. No. 2369 of 2021 with M.A. No. 2833 of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

57 paragraphs · 3,314 words

M.A. No. 2833 of 2021:

1.

Vide this application, respondents seek condonation of 6 days' delay in filing the Reply Statement. In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, delay is condoned and the Reply Statement is taken on record.

MA stands disposed of accordingly.

O.A. No. 2369 of 2021:

This original application has been filed under Section 14 of the  Armed  Forces Tribunal  Act  2007  by  the  applicant,  a serving Havildar Clerk (Staff Duties) [Hav/Clk(SD)] of the Army Service Corps (ASC). The applicant is aggrieved by the fact that consequent  to  his  reporting to  his  new duty  station  directly from where he was attached, without reporting to his parent unit, his parent unit initially declared him being absent without leave (AWL), and later declared him a 'deserter'. Consequently, the  applicant's  pay  and  allowances  (P&,A)  has  been  stopped  since January 2021, and the break in service has  to be regularised.  The applicant is,  therefore,  now required to now report to ASC  Centre  (South)  where  necessary action will be taken  to regularise  the  break  in  service.  The  applicant  has made the following prayers :-

A.  To   direct  the   Respondents  to  release  Pay  &  Allowances of Applicant and set aside the Army HQ letter dt. 13 Oct 2021, and/or

B.  To  direct  the  Respondent  to  cancel  of OSL/Desertion Part-2 Order by the No.519 ASC Bn and   afresh   Part-2   Order  to  be  published  to regularise his posting out movement to Stn HQ well wherein he had already serving since 17 Dec 2020.

C.  Necessary  direction  to  Respondent  to  disseminate his  Pay and  allowances including posting transfer grant which is withheld since Jan 2021 without any fault of individual and/or

D.  Direct the Respondent to regularize his posting move and also pay compensation for un-necessary harassment since Dec 2020 and illegal withholding of pay and allowances due to the lapses on the part of CO 519 ASC Bn, and/or

E.  Any other just and equitable order in the interest of justice may kindly be passed.

In  the interim, issue  directions  to  release  the  pay  and allowances and stay the operation of the impugned letter dated 13.10.2021.

Brief Facts of the Case

2.

The brief facts of the case as per the applicant are that he was  enrolled  in  the  Army  in  April  2008.  In  April  2018  the applicant was posted to 519 ASC Battalion from where he was sent on attachment to HQ Northern Command (ST Branch). In August  2009,  his  posting was  issued  to  Stn  HQ  Wellington, Nilgiris,  Tamil  Nadu. Despite  protracted  correspondence  the NCO was not relieved in time from HQ Northern Comd (ST). He was finally relieved on 23.11.2020  and returned to unit permanently.  He was also granted 20 days casual leave from 27.11.2020  to 16.12.2020  and was  required  to  report to  his parent unit 519 ASC Bn on termination of leave.  Since there were numerous correspondences on the  delayed  move  of the NCO and instructions that he would be declared Absent Without Leave  (AWL),  on expiry of the casual leave,  the NCO reported directly to his new unit, Stn HQ Wellington instead of reporting to his parent unit.

3.

Despite repeated request from Stn HQ to 519 ASC Bn to regularise the move by publishing necessary Part II order and forwarding  requisite  movement  order, 519  ASC  Bn  chose  to declare the NCO AWL from 17.12.2020 and later declared him a deserter too. 519 ASC Bn insisted that the NCO first report to the parent unit and then the move would be regularised.

4.

Instruction from ASC Records (South), HQ 15 Corps (ST) and HQ Northern Comd (ST) to 519 ASC Bn to cancel the AWL Part  II Orders and  forward  requisite  movement  order  went unheeded. In the meanwhile, based on the Part  II orders published by 519 ASC Bn declaring the NCO as AWL and later, a deserter,  his  pay and  allowances  (P86A)  were  stopped from January 2021.

5.

The issue was then taken up by Stn HQ Wellington with DG S&T, the parent Directorate and Head of Arms of ASC and the matter travelled to Army HQ. The policy of declaring such Clks/PA as AWL and consequently stopping their P&A was also brought to the notice of the COAS, who then issued necessary instructions  to  such  practices  to  stop  forthwith.  Despite numerous instructions from the IHQ of MoD (Army), DG S&T, ASC  Records  and  the  Formation  HQs,  519  ASC  Bn  did  not cancel the Part II Orders and consequently the P&A were not restored. The NCO also sent a personal application to the COAS dated  12.10.2021 (Annexure  A-7)  regarding the  issue  with  a prayer to pass instructions for cancellation of Part II orders and restoration of P&A. Aggrieved by the fact that the Part II orders are yet to be cancelled and P&A restored,  the  applicant filed this OA.

Arguments by the Counsel for the Applicant

6.

The  Counsel took us through the  service profile of the applicant  and  stated  that,  though posted  to  519  ASC  Bn in April 2018,  he  was  attached  to  ST  Branch  in  HQ  Northern Comd for the complete tenure. The Counsel then explained that as per the posting order issued in August 2020 in respect of the applicant, he was required to report to Stn HQ Wellington on 15.10.2020.   He   then   went   on   to   explain   how   despite instructions and appeal by  the applicant too, he was not relieved  in  time  to  be  able  to report  to  the  new unit as  per instructions. The Counsel then explained that as per the existing instructions as given in the posting order, if  the applicant  did  not  report  on  schedule  he  would  be  declared AWL/ deserter.

7.

The Counsel  then  went  on  to explain  how  on  being relived on 23.11.2020 the applicant had been granted 20 days casual leave and how fearing punitive action by the new unit, the applicant had reported directly to Stn HQ Wellington. The Counsel  then  added  that  consequent  to  this 519 ASC Bn declared the applicant AWL and deserter, as a result of which his P&A were stopped from January 2021. The Counsel then took  us  through  the  various  correspondence  on  the  efforts made by various HQ/  establishments  to  regularise the move and how it had not fructified till date, as 519 ASC Bn would not cancel  the  Part  II  Orders  pertaining  to  the  applicant's AWL/ desertion.  The  Counsel  vehemently  concluded  that  the P86A  needs  to  be  restored  forthwith as  it  is  causing  grave financial crisis to the  applicant and his family,  and that the posting be regularised at the earliest.

Arguments by the Counsel for the Respondents

8.

The Counsel briefly took us through the service profile of the NCO and stated that though the applicant was posted to 519 ASC Bn located in field area, he remained attached to HQ Northern Command located in a peace area. He then stated that on completion of his attachment, the applicant was granted 20 days casual leave and was instructed to report to 519 ASC Bn on termination of the leave.  The Counsel further added that despite  being  a  Hay  with  almost 13  years  of service  and  a person  who  is  well  versed  with  rules  and  regulations, the applicant wilfully did not report to 519 ASC Bn on termination of his leave, and instead reported to his new unit.  Since the applicant did not report to 519 ASC Bn, as was required, the unit declared him AWL and subsequently declared him a deserter and completed the requisite documentation.  The Counsel vehemently  stated  that  the  current  situation  of the applicant  has  been  brought  upon  by  himself and  his  wilful disobedience of orders and not reporting back to his unit on termination of leave in December 2020.

Consideration of the Case

9.

Heard both sides at length and on perusal of the various documents on record in the OA  (a total of 36),  the following issues are established:-

(a)  In April 2018, on being posted to 519 ASC Bn (under HQ 15  Corps/ HQ  Northern  Comd) the  applicant  was  sent  on temporary duty to 222 ASC Coy (Sup) located at Udhampur and further  attached   to   HQ   Northern   Command (Supply 86 Transport) Branch where he worked as a clerk.

(b)  In August 2020, ASC Records (South) issued the posting order  in respect of 10 NCOs including  the applicant.  The applicant was posted to Stn HQ Wellington and was to report on  15.10.2020.  As per the policy in vogue,  the posting order also contained  instructions that should the  NCOs not report within 15 days of the designated date of reporting, the receiving unit should declare the individual AWL and, after a period of 30 days, if the individual still does not report, he be declared a deserter.

(c)  Since there was no information of the applicant's move, Stn HQ wrote to 519 ASC  Bn and others indicating that the NCO should report on due date, failing  which he will  be declared AWL/ deserter.

(d)  The requirement  of  providing  a  suitable relief  to  the applicant had  been projected  by HQ  Northern  Comd  (ST)  in September  2020  itself.  The  applicant  too  had  submitted  an application to the unit requesting that he be relieved on time so that  he  could  proceed  on  posting.  On 16.10.2020  Stn  HQ Wellington issued a signal declaring the applicant will be reported as AWL since he had not reported on the due date.

(e)  Despite  many  reminders,  the  applicant  was  finally relieved only  on 23.11.2020. HQ Northern Comd (ST) also granted  him 20  days   casual  leave  from 27.11.2020  to 16.12.2020, on termination of which the applicant was required to report to his parent unit, 519  ASC  Bn.  Accordingly, necessary movement order was issued by 222 ASC Coy (Sup), the unit to which the  applicant was attached whilst working with the Comd HQ.

(f)  On termination of the 20 days leave, instead of reporting to 519 ASC Bn, his parent unit as per movement order issued to him, the applicant reported directly to his new duty station, Stn HQ Wellington.

(g)  Stn HQ Wellington therefore, informed 519 ASC Bn of the fact that the applicant had reported to the new duty station on termination  of his  leave.  And,  that  since  the  applicant  had reported without proper movement, the move be regularised by publishing requisite Part II order for posting out and to forward a movement order.

(h)  In the meanwhile,  since the applicant did not report to his parent unit on expiry of leave,  519 ASC Bn declared him AWL from 17.12.2020. Moreover, on receipt of info from Stn HQ Wellington, that the applicant had reported there directly, 519 ASC  Bn  intimated  Stn  HQ  Wellington  that  the  applicant  be reverted  forthwith  to  the  unit  for  taking  clearance  and completing other posting out formalities. Based on a case taken up by Stn HQ Wellington,  ASC Records too requested 519 ASC Bn complete the requisite documentation and regularise the posting.  Alongside,  another Section of the Records office issued instructions to 519 ASC Bn regarding  the  documentation  to  be  completed  to  declare  the applicant  AWL/ deserter.  Apparently,  this  section  issued  an apprehension roll too, based on all of which the applicant's P86A were stopped.

(i)  Over  the next  few  months, correspondence  continued amongst Stn HQ, ASC Records, and 519 ASC Bn requesting the unit to cancel the Part II Orders of AWL/ Desertion in order to put a closure to the case. Even HQ 15 Corps and HQ Northern Comd (ST) advised the unit to take necessary action to cancel the Part II Orders, all with no avail on part of 519 ASC Bn.

(k)  Ultimately the matter travelled to IHQ  of MoD.  In July 2021, DGST was informed to instruct the ASC Record Office not to accept any declaration of AWL of PA/Clk based on the DGSD Policy dated  17.08.2020 and to restore all cessation of P86A of PA/Clks undertaken based on this policy. It also directed that a new draft policy be submitted by 15.08.2021 for approval of the competent authority.

(1)  In July 2021, AG's Branch also sent out instructions to all  Record  Offices  that  the  competent  authority has  directed that declaring an individual AWL by the receiving unit even as he  continues  to  serve  in  the  previous  unit  and  stoppage  of salary through UMO or any other communication to PAO(OR) by Records Office / Unit must cease with immediate effect. And that  salary withheld  till now was required  to  be  released on priority for which proactive role has to be played by all concerned Record Offices. Record offices were also instructed to take certain specific action and also forward monthly progress reports. This letter was also copied to all Comd HQs and Line Directorates   for   their   information   and   necessary   action (Annexure A-8).

(m)  Based on the above directions from Army HQ, once again instructions went  out from  all  to  519  ASC  Bn  to  cancel the AWL/  desertion  Part II  orders pertaining to  the  applicant so that his  move  on  posting could be  regularised  and  the  P&A restored. Even explanation has sought by DGST from 519 ASC Bn as to why the posting was not implemented on time to begin with. Stn  HQ  Wellington  too  sought  confirmation  from  ASC Records on restoration of P&A in the light of the instructions issued by Army HQ.  The  applicant too  submitted a personal application to COAS, requesting early resolution and release of P&A.

(n)  Finally, DGST vide its letter 77344/UMO/Gen/ Q/1/ST-12 dated 13.10.2021 intimated Stn HQ that the whole episode had resulted in a  break  in service for the applicant  from 17.12.2020  till  date,  and  that  in  order  to  regularise  it,  the applicant is  now required  to  report to  Depot  Coy  (Impugned order : Annexure A-1).

10.

This  Tribunal  is  seized  of the  issues  involved  in  the management of Clerks and PAs,  and the difficulties faced by ASC Records and DGST in particular, and all other Records in ensuring that posting issued for clerical staff are implemented in a timely manner. The Tribunal has examined many cases where  the  clerks  themselves  have  circumvented  postings  to meet their personal requirements.  Regrettably, it is also seen that this has often been made possible with the acquiescence of offices/ establishments to which they are posted.

11.

In the case at hand, it is seen that a NCO was sent on attachment to another organisation for the entire duration of his  tenure  with  a  specific  unit,  culminating  in  the  current impasse.  Respondents   need   to   review   such   prolonged attachment resulting in poor command and control,  and management of personnel involved. It needs to make necessary provision to ensure that  such requirements  are met through formal  postings  than  through   ad  hoc  arrangements  of  attachments.  Such prolonged attachments  must only be an exception,  that  too with  requisite  approval  of the  competent authority.

12.

With  the  posting  order  having  been  issued  in  August 2020, the hierarchy  did not  take  action  to implement  the posting of the applicant on time. Even while HQ Northern Comd sought relief well in time, it has taken two full months for the relief to be provided. The current punitive orders of declaring an individual AWL, should he fail to report within the stipulated period  and  subsequently  be  declared  a  deserter,  clearly indicates that the onus of implementing the posting is on the individual. It is not understood, what the poor soldier can do when   the   hierarchy   does   not   exhibit   any   urgency   or involvement in supporting the posting system, and is also not made and held responsible in implementing postings. Clearly, in this case, while the applicant may have had any other reason not to report to his  parent unit,  the issue  of being declared AWL/ deserter subsequently resulting in stoppage of P86A must have clearly weighed on the applicant when he decided to report directly to the new unit on expiry of leave.

13.

It is gratifying to note that when this punitive policy was brought to the notice of the COAS, necessary corrective measures  were   immediately  instituted  to   ameliorate  the difficulties   faced   by   the   clerical/PA   staff.  Sadly,  the implementation of these  orders by the  subordinates  and the Records are clearly found wanting. Despite the corrective instructions  have  been  issued  in  July  2021,  it  is  yet  to  be implemented in the case of the applicant.

14.

It is also pertinent to mention that, having completed the attachment and having been granted 20 days casual leave with instructions to report to the parent unit, the applicant clearly  disobeyed the instructions by not reporting to 519 ASC Bn, his parent  unit;  precipitating  the  whole  episode,  and consequentially  suffering the  stoppage  of P&A  for almost 11 months now.

15.

519  ASC  Bn,  the  parent  unit  of the  applicant  is  well within its right to expect the applicant to report to the unit on expiry of leave,  as  this  is  the  standard  operating procedure. However,  the  subsequent action of the  Unit  in  declaring the applicant AWL/  deserter seems to be an action driven by an urge of retribution. However, once the organisation was seized of the complete situation and took a decision to regularise the movement  of  the  applicant  and  instructed  519  ASC  Bn  to cancel the AWL/  deserter Part II Orders, the recalcitrant and stubborn attitude of the unit in refusing to implement formal orders, must be clearly seen as an act of disobedience of orders. Sadly, since the whole issue seems to have been handled by the staff, no Commander in chain has stepped in to make CO 519 ASC Bn accountable and implement the instructions.

16.

It is seen from the latest instructions of DGST to Stn HQ Wellington that the entire episode has resulted in a break in service of the applicant from  17.12.2020 till date. And that in order to regularise the break in service, the applicant is now required to report to the Depot Company, ASC Centre (South). In our opinion, the regularisation can be undertaken through executive  directions  by  the  competent  authority  without  the applicant having to physically report to the Depot Company.

17.

In view of the foregoing, the OA is allowed and we direct the following :-

(a)  The Part II order issued by 519 ASC Bn regarding AWL/ desertion is hereby cancelled.

(b)  Apprehension Roll, if any, issued in respect of the applicant  is  also  hereby  cancelled,  if not  already cancelled.

(c)  Applicant be taken on strength of Stn HQ with effect from  17.12.2020 and  necessary  Part  II  order  be published by the unit.

(d)  The pay and allowances of the applicant be restored forthwith. All arrears be also paid forthwith.

(e)  Break in  service  be regularised  by  the  competent authority  through  necessary  executive  directions, without  the  applicant  having  to  report  to  Depot Company.

(f)  Respondents to investigate the reasons for delay in providing necessary relief  and implementing  the posting order; and take suitable action against those responsible as deemed appropriate.

(g)  Respondents to investigate and take suitable action as deemed appropriate against:-

(i)  CO 519 ASC Bn for  not  implementing  the instructions to cancel  the Part  II  order  and regularise the posting of the applicant.

(ii)  The applicant for not reporting to 519 ASC Bn, his parent  unit  on expiry  of  the casual leave granted to him.

(h)  Respondents to review the current instructions on implementation  of posting of clerks/  PAs  in  both ASC and Non ASC Units and include requisite provisions to make both, the organisation and individual clerk/ PA  responsible  for  timely implementation of postings.

(i)  Respondents to file a status reports on restoration of pay and allowances and regularising the posting of the  applicant  within  one  month  of this  order. Status report on action taken against CO 519 ASC Bn,  the  applicant, and  review  of instructions  on implementing posting of clerks/PAs be filed within four months of this order.

18.

With  the  aforesaid  directions,  OA  stands  disposed  of. There is no order as to costs.

Pronounced in open Court on this 8th day of December, 2021.