High CourtsDivision Bench(1923) 05 CAL CK 0006

Hatemali Chaprasi vs Osimaddy and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 May 1923 · Citation: 73 Ind. Cas. 814

HON’BLE JUDGES
Cuming, J · C.C. Ghose, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 91 words
1.

In this case, as the record shows, there was no evidence adduced at all before the Magistrate. That being so; the order of the Magistrate holding that the second party is entitled to possession of the property in dispute is one which must be set aside. It has been repeatedly held by this Court that a Magistrate has no jurisdiction to make an order under this Section without any evidence being adduced before him.

2.

Accordingly the order complained of is set aside.

3.

The Rule is accordingly made absolute.