Tribunals and Commissions(1997) 08 NCDRC CK 0063

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SIRI KISHAN

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 19 August 1997 · Citation: 1997 3 CPJ 572

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.R.Agnihotri , Sushil Paul , A.D.Malik J.
RESULT
Order set aside

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 164 words
1.

AFTER hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the record we find that the impugned order dated 30th January, 1997 has been passed by learned President of the District Forum sitting singly i.e. without associating with him either of the two companion Members. The facts is very well known to the learned President of the District Forum as well as to us that both the companion Members have since completed their terms and their successors were not appointed till 30th January, 1997 when the impugned order was passed. Hence, the order is without jurisdiction being violative of the provision of Section 14(2) of the Consumer Protection Act. Consequently, we accept the revision petition, set aside the impugned order and remit the case back to the learned District Forum, Gurgaon for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The petitioner through their learned Counsel is directed to appear before learned District Forum, Gurgaon on 3rd September 1997. Order set aside.