High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 10 DEL CK 0110

Harpal Singh vs Maya Devi & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J · Neena Bansal Krishna, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAT.APP.(F.C.) No. 308 Of 2023, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 54358 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 366 words

CM APPL. 54357/2023 (Seeking Exemption)

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 308/2023

3.

The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed against the impugned Order dated 25.09.2023 passed in Suit No.142/23 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi with the following prayer :

“a. Call for the trial court record;

b. Set-aside the impugned order/ judgment dated 25.09.2023 passed by the Court of Sh. Vipin Kumar Rai, Ld. Judge Family Courts, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit No.142/2023 having title Harpal Singh Versus Maya Devi & Ors., in the interest of justice.

c. Restrain the Respondents, their legal heirs and Respondents' s family members, Associates, Successor and any other person on behalf of the Respondents from creating any kind of in cumbrance in the performance of the peaceful last Rites of the Appellant.

d. Direct the respondent no. l to provide protection to son of the petitioner namely Master Samrat Singh from Respondent No. 1 & 2 at the time of performing last rites of petitioner.

e. Restrain the respondents not to participate or touch the dead body of the Appellant and also not interfere in the last rites performance, done by Master Samrat in any manner.”

4.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Will has already been executed in favour of Master Samrat son of the appellant from live-in relationship. A prayer is made by way of this Appeal that at the time of death of the appellant, his wife i.e. the respondent and her associates may be restrained from creating any kind of encumbrance in the performance of his peaceful last Rites.

5.

However, at the time of the death of the appellant, the Executor of the Will may take requisite steps to prevent any ruckus from the family of the respondent/ wife, in terms of the Will and no Orders are required to be made in this regard.

6.

We find that there is no cause of action disclosed in the suit and has been rightly dismissed.

7.

We find no merit in the Appeal which is hereby dismissed along with the pending application.