High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 07 DEL CK 2019

Harish Jindal vs Garima Jindal

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 July 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Amit Bansal, J
CASE NUMBER
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 220/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 384 words

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL)

CM APPL. 39572/2024

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 220/2024 and CM APPL. 39571/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking direction]

2.

Issue notice.

2.1

Ms Swaty Singh Malik, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/mother.

3.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself.

4.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.06.2024 passed by Mr Harish Kumar, learned Family Court Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in an application preferred by the appellant/father under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards,1890 [in short, “Act”].

4.1

The operative directions issued are contained in paragraphs twelve (12) and thirteen (13) of the impugned judgment and order. For convenience, the same are extracted hereafter:

“12.

Hence, at this stage physically meeting of the son with the petitioner will not be good for the child, however, he may meet the child virtually i.e. by way of letter, email or Whatsapp chat expressing his love and affection thereby trying to win him back or alternatively allow some more time to pass.

13.

With aforesaid observation, direction and with liberty to the petitioner to reagitate for interim custody/visitation, the application of the petitioner u/s 12 of the G & W Act stands disposed of accordingly.”

5.

Mr Alok Kumar, learned senior counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/father says that, for the moment, the appellant/father will be satisfied if the order is varied to the extent that the appellant/father has an opportunity to interact with the child (who is about 14 years old) via a video call made through WhatsApp.

6.

Ms Malik, on instructions of the respondent/mother, says that the respondent/mother will facilitate the meeting through a video call via WhatsApp.

7.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with a direction that paragraph twelve (12) of the impugned judgment and order will stand varied to the extent that the appellant/father would have liberty to interact with the child every Sunday, between 12.00 Noon and 12.30 P.M., through a video call via WhatsApp.

7.1

This direction will operate from 21.07.2024.

8.

Other parts of the impugned judgment and order will remain unaltered.

9.

Pending applications shall also stand closed.