High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0666

Hari Kishan & Anr vs Farzana & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 720 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 217 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

By the impugned judgment dated 24.07.2015, the tribunal had granted compensation, apportioning the award amongst the seven claimants, shown in

the array as respondents in the appeal. On 07.04.2016, it was pointed out by the counsel representing the other claimants that the sixth respondent had

passed away. The appellants took adjournment for taking appropriate steps. This request being repeatedly made, the matter was adjourned by the

Joint Registrar awaiting appropriate application on several dates including 28.07.2016, 28.11.2016, 23.03.2017 and finally on 20.07.2017. No steps

having been taken, the Joint Registrar has passed the last order placing this case before this court with the opinion that the appeal has abated qua the

said respondent.

2.

Since the cause of action was common, no steps having been taken to substitute the deceased respondent, the appeal would abate. These

proceedings are accordingly closed.

3.

The amount deposited by the appellant in terms of order dated 16.09.2015 shall be passed over by the registry to the tribunal with accrued interest

for further necessary directions towards satisfaction of award. The tribunal may be approached by the claimants by appropriate application with

regard to the allocation of the share of the deceased sixth respondent.

4.

The statutory deposit shall be refunded.

5.

The appeal is disposed of in above terms.