High CourtsSingle Bench(1922) 02 CAL CK 0016

Hara Sundar Majumdar vs Lahabar Singh

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 1 February 1922 · Citation: AIR 1923 Cal 315 : 67 Ind. Cas. 277

HON’BLE JUDGES
Greaves, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 131 words

Greaves, J.—In this Rule it appears from the materials before me that the Judge has clearly acted under a misapprehension in disallowing the travelling expenses of the witnesses. He states that it is the practice for the parties to pay such expenses. No doubt the party who summons a witness pays his expenses in the first instance. But, clearly, if he is successful, he is entitled as against the unsuccessful party against whom costs are awarded to recover all proper expenses including travelling expenses, incurred by summons of the witness and paid in the first instance by the successful party.

2.

The Rule is accordingly made absolute and the Judge will allow the travelling expenses of the witnesses properly incurred.

3.

I make no order as to costs of this Rule.