High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 11 KAR CK 0181

Hanumanthappa vs Smt. Priyadarshini and Sri H. Jayappa

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 4 November 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Malimath, J · N. Kumar, J
CASE NUMBER
CCC. No. 1340 of 2011 (Civil)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 189 words

Kumar, J.—This petition is filed complaining of disobedience of the order dated 15.11.2010 passed in W.P.No.19073/2009.

2.

The direction issued is to consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Grama Sahayaka along with other candidates and also that of respondent No.2 and thereafter, respondent No.1 is at liberty to make selection in accordance with criteria laid down in Annexure-A.

3.

After service of notice, the respondents have entered appearance and a counter affidavit is filed by the Tahsildar, Honnalli Taluk, Davanagere along with annexures, which shows that a notification has been issued calling for applications for the post of Grama Sahayaka. It is stated in the counter affidavit that the case of the petitioner, as per the direction of the Court, would be considered along with other candidates, As the respondents have taken steps, there is no contempt. The proceedings are dropped.

4.

It is made clear that the respondents shall consider the application already filed by the petitioner without insisting an any fresh application in pursuance of the fresh notification issued.

5.

Learned Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks.