Privy Council(1911) 02 PRI CK 0007

Hanif-Un-Nisa and Another vs Fiaz-Un-Nisa (Since Deceased) and another

Privy Council · Decided on 14 February 1911 · Citation: (1911) 38 IndApp 85

HON’BLE JUDGES
Macnaghten, Robson, Arthur Wilson, Ameer Ali, JJ.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 80 words

Macnaghten, J. 1. Their Lordships think the decree appealed from cannot be sustained. They are of opinion that the proper course will be to remit the case to the High Court to be dealt with on the evidence, and they will humbly advise His Majesty accordingly. The costs of the further hearing will be costs in the cause. As the appellants have been successful upon the point of law, they will have their costs of the appeal incurred in England.