Privy Council(1926) 01 PRI CK 0001

Hajee Shakoor Gany, since deceased. (now represented by Dawood Hajee Shakoor, minor) vs T.S. Sabapathi Pillai

Privy Council · Decided on 28 January 1926 · Citation: (1926) AIR(PC) 84

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arthur Channell, Ameer Ali, Viscount Dunedin, JJ.
CASE NUMBER
Privy Council Appeal No. 118 of 1924

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 66 words

Viscount Dunedin, J.

Their Lordships are of opinion that this case is clearly governed by the judgment of their Lord ships'' Board in Probhudas v. Ganidada AIR 1925 P. C. 157.

They will, therefore, humbly advise His Majesty that the appeal should be allowed, the decrees of both Courts below set aside, and judgment entered for the appellant with costs here and in the Courts below.