Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2017) 11 SC CK 0089

H. Prabhakar Baliga & Anr. vs Vasudeva Rao Kanemar @ V.R. Kanemar & Anr.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 30 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, J · Amitava Roy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.A. No. 483 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 198 words
1.

The appellants/tenants are aggrieved by the impugned orders passed by the High Court. According to the appellants, House Rent Control Petition for eviction was not maintainable in view of the bar under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents points out that at the time when the eviction petition was filed the same was maintainable and the bar was only created by the subsequent amendment. It is also submitted that these aspects have been considered by this Court in R. Kapilnath (Dead) through LR. v. Krishna, reported in 2003(1) R.C.R.(Rent) 82 : (2003) 1 SCC 444 . It has been held by this Court that the proceedings which had already been initiated prior to the amendments would not affect the pending actions. 3. We do not, hence, find any merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. 4. However, the appellants are granted time up to 31.03.2018 to surrender vacant possession of the premises in question, subject to the appellants'' filing a usual undertaking before this Court within three weeks. 5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 6. There shall be no orders as to costs.