Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 10 NCLT CK 3202

Gurushree Builders vs BGR Energy Systems Limited

National Company Law Tribunal, Amaravati Bench · Decided on 20 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial) · Charan Singh, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
C.P. (IB)/106(AM)2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 413 words

Per Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial):

1.

Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties.

2.

This Petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 has been preferred by the Operational Creditor namely Gurushree Builders seeking initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor namely BGR Energy Systems Limited.

3. Facts in a nutshell:

3.1

The Operational Creditor is engaged in site mix concrete and various civil works and engaged itself in civil contracts. Whereas the Corporate Debtor carries on business on two segments, the supply of systems and equipment, Turnkey in engineering projects and contracting. In the turnkey in engineering projects in the power and oil and gas sector, it takes turnkey responsibility to supply of a range equipment and services including a civil works required for a project. 3.2 In the month of August, 2021 the Corporate Debtor approached the Operational Creditor for quotations for supplying SMC for the project undertaken by it (i.e., Nuppl. 3 X 660 MW) Ghatampur Thermal Power Projects, Ghatampur, Kanpur. The corporate debtor had issued purchase order and in terms of that purchase order bearing number 3100038535 dated 09/08/2021 revised on- 15/09/2021 and service order bearing no. 3300034476 dated- 09/08/2021 revised on 15/09/2021. 3.3 As per terms (95%) amount of Invoices was to be paid in 30 days and balance (5%) within six months. During September 2021 to December, 2021 Operational; Creditor had raised eight invoices but failed to receive the outstanding amount from the Corporate Debtor. 3.4 The Operational Creditor was constrained to issue demand notice under Section 8 claiming an amount of Rs. 1.31 Crores which comprises of Rs. 1.25 Crores as Principal amount and balance towards interests.

4.

The present application was filed on 07.06.2022 and till its hearing, the Operational Creditor was given assurance by the Corporate Debtor that the matter would be settled amicably.

5.

Even on the final date of hearing no settlement was recorded by the parties. However, subsequent to hearing, it appears that the Joint Settlement Memo has been filed on 18.09.2023 by the Operational Creditor presumably to record the settlement between the parties. In view of such, the C.P. (IB)/106(AM)2022 is dismissed as withdrawn for the present. In the event settlement fails creditor will be at liberty to get the CP restored.

6.

The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties inclusive of the Counsel.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be issued upon compliance with all requisite formalities.