High CourtsDivision Bench(1901) 03 MAD CK 0015

Gurusam1 Chetti vs Krishnasami Naikar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 March 1901 · Citation: (1901) ILR (Mad) 419

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J · Bhashyam Ayyangar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 90 words
1.

In Chapter XXVI of the CPC and particularly in petitions 402 and 407, the restrictions on the liberty of the right to sue as a pauper are

expressly prescribed. We should be adding to those restrictions if we hold that a man should not be allowed to sue as a pauper when his suit is one

that is brought under the Devasthanam Act.

2.

We must reverse the order and remand the case for the proper disposal of the petitions. Respondents must pay the costs of the present

petitions.