Gurdeep Singh vs State of Punjab and another

Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of cross version vide rapat No.

24 (Annexure P1) of FIR No. 11 dated 30.1.2010 under Sections 323, 324, 341, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

(''IPC'' for short) registered at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P2) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on

the basis of compromise on 9.12.2011 (Annexure P3) .

Vide order dated 13.12.2017, a direction was given to the trial Court to record the statements of the parties and submit a report regarding the

genuineness of the compromise effected between the parties and also to intimate whether any accused is proclaimed offender.

In pursuance thereof, the trial Court has submitted a report (forwarded by the District and Sessions Judge Faridabad dated 29.1.2018 ), after

recording the statements of the parties. The trial Court has submitted that the complainant-Amrik Singh and accused- Gurdeep Singh have

appeared along with their respective counsel, who had identified them and got their statements recorded acknowledging that the compromise had

been effected voluntarily, without any coercion or any undue influence. It is further reported that the petitioner is not declared as proclaimed

offender.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is a cross-version of the same FIR and vide order dated 5.9.2012 (Annexure P4) passed

by this Court, the aforementioned FIR has been quashed .

Perusal of allegations in the FIR reveals that the present case squarely falls in the category of cases that can be quashed by the High Court, in

exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code. Keeping in view authoritative enunciation of law laid down by Hon''ble the Supreme

Court of India in ""Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another"", 2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 543 and in the light of facts and circumstances of the

present case, this Court is of the considered opinion that continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law and it is

expedient in the interest of justice that criminal proceedings are put to an end.

As per the Full Bench judgement of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, High Court

has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of non-compoundable offence and quash the prosecution where the High Court

felt that the same was required to prevent the abuse of the process of any Court or to otherwise secure the ends of justice. This power of quashing

is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.

The Apex Court in Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Sadhu Ram Singla and others (2017) 5 Supreme Court Cases 350 has held as under:-

Having carefully considered the singular facts and circumstances of the present case, and also the law relating to the continuance of criminal cases

where the complainant and the accused had settled their differences and had arrived at an amicable arrangement, we see no reason to differ with

the view taken in Manoj Sharma''s case (supra) and several decisions of this Court delivered thereafter with respect to the doctrine of judicial

restraint. In concluding hereinabove, we are not unmindful of the view recorded in the decisions cited at the Bar that depending on the attendant

facts, continuance of the criminal proceedings, after a compromise has been arrived at between the complainant and the accused, would amount to

abuse of process of Court and an exercise in futility since the trial would be prolonged and ultimately, it may end in a decision which may be of no

consequence to any of the parties.

Since the parties have arrived at a compromise and have decided to live in peace, no useful purpose would be served in allowing the criminal

proceedings to continue.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Cross version vide rapat No. 24 (Annexure P1) of FIR No. 11 dated 30.1.2010 under Sections 323, 324,

341, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P2) along with all the consequential

proceedings, arising therefrom, are ordered to be quashed by way of compromise subject to paying costs in the sum of Rs.5,000/- in the Office of

District Legal Services Authority, Jalandhar within 8 weeks from today, failing which this order shall stand recalled automatically without reference

to the Court.