High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 03 BOM CK 0005

Gunnaji Bhavaji vs Makanji Khushalchand

Bombay High Court · Decided on 2 March 1909 · Citation: 3 Ind. Cas. 159

HON’BLE JUDGES
Basil Scott, C.J · Batchelor, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 132 words
1.

In this case we cannot agree with the learned Judge of the Court below that an amendment such as was asked for would convert the suit into a suit of different and inconsistent character. The suit would remain the same based upon exactly the same cause of action except for the addition of one allegation. We think, therefore, that the amendment should be allowed as shown in para. 1 of the memorandum of appeal, but as the controversy has arisen entirely through the negligence of the plaintiffs, we direct that they must pay the costs of the appeal and of the first hearing in the Court below including the costs if any of the hearing of the judgment. Leave granted to defendants to file a supplemental written statement, if so advised.