High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 11 MAD CK 0168

Gunasekar And Others vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 November 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Sivagnanam, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 21094 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 413 words

V. Sivagnanam, J

1.

The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.09.2023 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 302 IPC in Crime No.469 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 12.09.2023, a male dead body was found in the well. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that the petitioners are innocents and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioners are in custody from 13.09.2023, hence he seeks bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, investigation conducted and the same is now completed. He would further submit that there is no previous case pending as against the petitioners.

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

[i] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District and on further conditions that:

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court on first working day of every month at 10.30 am., until further orders.

(iv)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (v)the petitioners shall not abscond during trial.

vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

vii)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.